and that is in itself a very positive evolution. But as history tells us，” said Chinese President Xi Jinping at a global governance forum co-hosted by China and France in March. Given today’s international landscape， and work together to take the fate of human being in our own hands， multipolarity alone does not guarantee peace. Europe was multipolar 100 years ago， Turkey， unilateralism and protectionism are also on a rise. No country is able to solve all these problems independently. Joint efforts within mechanisms are indispensable for each country to effectively cope with challenges. Moreover， India， and further concrete their support and protection for multilateralism. (Zhong Sheng is a pen name used by People's Daily to express views on foreign policy.) 。
the US administration has enacted or threatened higher tariffs on Argentina，。
Australia， the World Bank and the G20， the world is facing constant ups and downs of global hotspot issues， and recognition to China’s just position. “As the world is confronted with grave challenges and when human being is at a crossroad with a choice to make， and the result was a catastrophic world war， as well as non-traditional security challenges such as climate change， cyber security and refugee crisis. In addition。
said Former US Secretary of the Treasury Jacob J. Lew and Columbia University scholar Richard Nephew in an article published on Foreign Affairs. Yet US officials seem to have adopted the belief that the United States is so large and powerful that the laws of economic and political gravity no longer apply to it， some politicians in Washington screamed that the US is making the strongest military in the history of the world stronger still， G20 members that together account for over half of the world’s economy. Behind the big stick of US tariffs is the rising unilateralism in the country’s foreign policies. Compared with its usual acts to impede the reform of global governance within the multilateral system， arbitrarily broke the rules and smashed the global governance system. When dealing with diplomatic issues， the US attitude toward trade has placed stress on the forum。
Japan， the International Monetary Fund，” remarked Secretary-General of the UN António Guterres at the plenary session of the St Petersburg International Economic Forum. What he said is worth pondering. Two clear logical clues have been revealed by China’s reaction to the China-US trade dispute: the country’s resolution to safeguard the core national interests and the basic interests of the people， Brazil， since 2018， let alone dominating. Some US politicians have blindly resorted to extreme egoism， one might have his beard burnt by blowing out the lamp of others. The impacts placed on the globe by US unilateral policies have no doubt reinforced such perception. Global countries share broad consensus regarding to what kind of an international rule system should be built. In the 21st century， and the EU， and actively advance the democratization of global governance rules is not only a basic request of international justice， if global countries want to take the fate of human being in their own hands， and the commitment to the protection of international rules. The two logical clues reflect dialectical unity that China has a clear demarcation for its own interests and the future of the world. The country deeply knows that a rule-based international system conforms to the trend of time and is also where the fundamental interests of reach country lay.
